Part “Brave New World,” part
“Planet of the Apes,” “Logan's Run” mixes dystopian sci-fi
and action, with some titties thrown in to distract us from the
low-rent special effects.
In a post-apocalyptic future America,
people live in giant domes for protection from the blasted outside
landscape. Technology provides them ample energy and food, and they
live lives of hedonism and leisure. But every utopia demands a
sacrifice. In Logan's world, population and resources are kept in
alignment by allowing people to live only to the age of 30. At that
point, people are sacrificed in a fiery ritual called Carousel.
Theoretically, Carousel can renew you, allowing you to reincarnate,
but many citizens instinctively disbelieve this, and when their time
comes, they run. Logan (Michael York) is a Sandman, a policeman
whose principle job is to catch and kill runners.
Logan and fellow Sandman Frances
(Richard Jordan) are happy in their jobs. Then Logan is selected by
the city's supercomputer for a special mission: to track down and
destroy a rebel stronghold for runners called Sanctuary. In order to
go undercover, Logan will have to pose as a runner, so, against
Logan's will, the computer speeds up his life clock to make it look
like he is turning 30. The computer also lets slip that Carousel is a
fraud. Combined with the years of life the computer stole from him,
this gives Logan a lot to think about as he embarks on his mission by
contacting Jessica (Jenny Agutter), a member of the Sanctuary rebels.
“Logan's Run” feels like someone
kidnapped the cast from a hard-core porno set and forced them to act
in a soft-core porno, then cut out the juiciest bits. In fairness, I
don't think these are exactly bad actors (except for Farrah Fawcett,
who really makes the least of her small role), I think they just
weren't sure what to do with the ludicrous material they were given.
Still, the poorly-written story and uninspired acting manage to
elevate the visual effects, which are so low-rent, they make “Dr.
Who” look like “Star Wars.”
While we're on the subject, “Star
Wars Episode IV: A New Hope” came out only 1 year after “Logan's
Run”. On a budget of $11 million, “Star Wars” managed to
create a universe of planets, aliens, robots, and spaceships that
looked real enough to take you out of your theater seat to a galaxy
far, far away. For its $7 million budget, “Logan's Run” manages
only to look like a joke. The cityscape is depicted using miniatures
that your accountant could have built in his basement on weekends.
Other effects look like they were rejected by the original “Star
Trek” tv show, including a ludicrous-looking robot named “Box.”
Come to think of it, “Star Trek” is one of many sci-fi
productions from the 1960's that look better than 1976's “Logan's
Run.”
And yet, despite all this, “Logan's
Run” has a certain charm. Like that girl who is more confident
than her appearance, this movie presents itself so boldly that you
find yourself drawn in, wondering if “Logan's Run” is better than
you are able to appreciate. Even now, I find myself wondering if I'm
the problem. Looking around at reviews of the film, many of which
tie themselves in knots trying to praise the schlocky special
effects, it strikes me that others are feeling the same effect. You
want to like this
movie! I say go with it. Give up on the theory that this is
actually a good movie and just enjoy the trashy ride. There are
explosions, floods, orgies, you-name-it. Michael York and Richard
Jordan manage to make bad acting look good, and Jenny Agutter is so
adorable in that little, silk kimono that I'd watch her read the
phone book!
3
stars out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment