Way back in 2004, Pixar introduced us
to the Parrs, a nice, suburban family who happened to have super
powers. Bob, the former Mr. Incredible, was super-strong. Helen
used to be Elastigirl, with the ability to stretch her body almost
limitlessly. Kids Violet and Dash had powers, too, but they weren't
allowed to showcase them. No one was. Superheroes had been
outlawed, so the Parrs lived a secret suburban existence of quiet
desperation, until a sinister threat arose that required the whole
family to use their powers. “The Incredibles” was a fun, funny
story,with an Ayn Randian message about excellence.
It took 14 years, but we finally have
a sequel. The story picks up right where the first film left off,
with the Parrs preparing to take on a tunneling super-villain called
The Underminer. Their battle with The Underminer creates a certain
amount of property damage, which does nothing to help the public
attitude toward Supers. There's still one member of the public who
is pro-Super, however. The billionaire CEO of a telecom company,
Winston Deavor (Bob Odenkirk), explains to Bob (Craig T. Nelson),
Helen (Holly Hunter), and Frozone (Samuel L. Jackson) that their
legal problems are all a matter of perception. He believes that he
can change that perception with all his TV stations and with the
right Super, who he believes is Elastigirl.
Deavor and his sister, Evelyn
(Catherine Keener) wire Elastigirl for sound and video and put her on
crime-watch in the big city. Almost immediately, a threat arises in
the form of the Screenslaver, a Luddite, terrorist hacker who can
hypnotize anyone watching a screen, which means pretty much anyone.
Helen repeatedly thwarts the Screenslaver's plans, and her heroics
turn the tide of public opinion in favor of supers. You can guess the
rest.
That's the one weakness of this
sequel: You really can guess the rest. Other than the rather
predictable plot, though, I loved it! “Incredibles 2” is
hilarious and action-packed, with great voice acting.
Writer/director Brad Bird has a particularly good time with baby
Jack-Jack's new powers. There's a sequence where Jack-Jack takes on
a plundering raccoon that could be its own little, hilarious short
film.
The strength of “Incredibles 2”,
as with “The Incredibles” and really most Pixar movies, is that
it doesn't insult our intelligence. It may be a cartoon, but its
characters and plot aren't cartoonish. The movie strives for
characters with believable motivations and a plot that is not exactly
believable, but is at least sensible. This film has the courage to
let its villain, the Screenslaver, make some valid points. People
are addicted to their
screens. People do
consistently sacrifice their privacy for the newest, most convenient
internet apps. People do yearn
for an easy way out of their problems, which, the Screenslaver points
out, is why they are so eager to bring the Supers back.
The
great thing about cartoon characters is that they don't age. It's
been 14 years since the original “The Incredibles”, but the Parrs
don't look a day older. Let's not wait another 14 years, though!
Pixar, if you can come up with another compelling story to tell in
this universe, let's see it! Maybe they should make a Frozone movie.
Now that would be Incredible!
4.5
stars out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment