How do you write about a movie about a
guy whose life was spent writing about movies? In this case, you do
it with gratitude for a film that beautifully and sometimes
heartbreakingly celebrates one of America's most beloved writers.
“Life Itself,” based on film critic Roger Ebert's memoir of the
same name, is Ebert's life story, focusing on his career as a film
critic and on his end-of-life struggle with throat cancer. Given
that Ebert essentially wrote it, this is an impressively
warts-and-all biopic. The audience is not spared Ebert's history of
alcoholism, his legendary petulance with his frenemy Gene Siskel, nor
the gruesome facial disfigurement of his cancer surgeries.
Almost everyone is familiar with Roger
Ebert's name, but if you have never read his movie reviews, you
should do yourself a favor and check out his website.
(www.rogerebert.com) Ebert once said that “movies are a machine for
generating empathy.” By this he referred to the process of sharing
human stories, of seeing not just the consequences of characters'
actions, but also their struggles and motivations, of seeing the
humanity of the villain and the frailty of the hero. A good movie
doesn't just lull us with sex and violence, it helps give us the
language to understand ourselves and each other; it generates
empathy. All art is designed to do this, but I think film may be the
most accessible to the masses of people, and thus it has the greatest
overall potential to increase the amount of empathy in the world.
Ebert certainly believed this, and
thus his writing, while always intelligent and literate, was
essentially populist. He didn't talk down to his readers, but he
wrote with an understanding that the movies and his reviews of them
were available to a wide audience, and he attempted to consider the
tastes of his entire audience in his reviews. “Life Itself”
shows a clip from “Sneak Previews” in which Siskel and Ebert
argue about the movie “Benji the Hunted.” Siskel hated the trite
movie, but Ebert defended it, pointing out that it was aimed at
children and should be evaluated in that light. That belief informed
all of his reviews.
At a full two hours, “Life Itself”
may be just slightly longer than it needs to be, but I only wound up
feeling restless at one point, and that quickly faded. Audiences
should also be prepared to see the grim results of Mr. Ebert's throat
surgeries, which finally left him without a lower jawbone and with no
connection between his mouth and his throat. Despite that, his face
is still surprisingly expressive, his eyes still sparkle, and his
warmth still shines through.
If I came away from “Life
Itself”with a warm, fuzzy feeling about Roger Ebert's life, it
isn't because of all he accomplished as a film writer. It's owing to
the dignity and optimism with which he and his family are shown
facing his death. I suppose we should keep in mind that Ebert had
some creative control here, so we are seeing him as he wanted to be
seen. Nonetheless, having read his movie reviews for years, I know
that the humor and empathy are real. Roger Ebert was a man who loved
movies and loved people, and loved helping people enjoy movies.
4 stars out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment