It's impossible to talk about Neill
Blomkamp's “Elysium” without talking about politics. It's a
shame, because the insistent, one-sided political message ruins the
story and what is an otherwise promising action, sci-fi movie.
“Elysium” imagines a future earth
which is so overcrowded and polluted that those who can afford it
have abandoned the surface to live on a giant, ring-shaped, orbiting
space station called Elysium. Conjuring up the biblical image of a
“wheel in the sky,” Elysium is visible from the gritty sprawl of
Los Angeles and serves as a tantalizing lure for the slum-dwelling
millions below. Is there anywhere on Earth that isn't this squalid?
The movie doesn't tell us, nor does it reveal to us much about the
citizens of Elysium other that they live in nice houses, each
equipped with a medical scanner that can diagnose and cure any
disease.
Down on the over-populated earth, they
don't have these scanners, so that is a strong draw for sick
earthlings to try to sneak up to Elysium, break into the houses, and
get access to the healing devices. When factory-worker Max (Matt
Damon) gets exposed to a lethal radiation dose, he becomes desperate
to get up to the station before radiation sickness kills him. He
contacts smugglers he knows from his days as a criminal, and they
agree to smuggle him to Elysium if he will first hijack a rich
executive and steal secrets from his brain.
Meanwhile, Elysium's ruthless security
chief Delacourt (Jodie Foster) is engaged in a political tug-of-war
with the station's weak-willed president. He doesn't have the
stomach for Delacourt's policy of shooting down unauthorized shuttles
when they refuse to turn back, but he has no plan for dealing with
the “undocumented immigrants” or the inequality that draws them.
Delacourt cooks up a rather un-believable plan to depose him with a
computer system reboot. Max uncovers this plan when he hijacks the
executive, and the computer code he downloads makes him a hunted man.
Science-Fiction has always provided
plenty of opportunity to explore political and social issues. Neill
Blomkamp did this well in “District 9,” where he explored the
complexities of dealing with a refugee population. The initial
contact between the humans and the starving aliens in that film is
filled with promise, but due to poor communication, the aliens are
not able to integrate into earth society. Openness gives way to
suspicion and fear, and the aliens become a ghetto-ized underclass.
The film recognizes that the situation is not the result of
intentional evil on the part of either side, but rather developed as
a result of one unfortunate incident after another, as well as basic
human (and alien) nature. By acknowledging these complexities,
“District 9” is able to serve as a vision and a warning about
relations between different groups of people, while at the same time
serving up satisfying sci-fi action.
“Elysium” gets the sci-fi action
part right, with stunning images of the space station and of guys
duking it out in cool exoskeleton suits. The concept is cool as
well. As with the movie “Snowpiercer,” however, the movie is
ruined by a sloppy story that seems to be written solely to promote a
simplistic, one-sided political message. Blomkamp clearly has a very
Liberal attitude towards issues of health care, immigration, and
economic inequality, and some may agree with him strongly enough to
enjoy the movie. I imagine that even most liberals, however, will
find the reductionist message heavy-handed, like something a college
freshman in a Che Guevara T-shirt would have written.
As it happens, in a recent interview,
Blomkamp basically apologized for the film, admitting that the story
was half-baked.
“I
feel like, ultimately, the story is not the right story. I still
think the satirical idea of a ring, filled with rich people, hovering
above the impoverished Earth, is an awesome idea. I love it so much,
I almost want to go back and do it correctly. But I just think the
script wasn’t… I just didn’t make a good enough film is
ultimately what it is. I feel like I executed all of the stuff that
could be executed, like costume and set design and special effects
very well. But, ultimately, it was all resting on a somewhat not
totally formed skeletal system, so the script just wasn’t there;
the story wasn’t fully there. “
It's rare to hear a director admit so
freely to his mistakes, and it gives me hope that Blomkamp still has
great work in him. I wasn't very impressed with the trailer for his
latest film, “Chappie,” but I liked “District 9” so much that
I will probably give the movie a chance. As for “Elysium,” it's
a good idea, wasted.
2 stars out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment