I've come to have high expectations
for animated films. Spoiled as I am by a decade of Pixar films like
“Wall-E” and “Monsters, Inc.,”I have little tolerance for
weak plots and acting. “The Lego Movie” and all of its hype
crashed into those expectations, and the results were rather
disappointing.
“The Lego Movie” tells the story
of Emmett (voiced by Chris Pratt), a generic, Lego construction
worker who spends his days with the other workers, building things
exactly according to the Lego instructions. Everyone in Legoland
follows the instructions, in obedience to Lord Business (Will
Ferrell), an OCD, control-freak micro-manager. Emmett is the most
boring Lego person in town, with absolutely nothing to distinguish
him, but he gets thrust into an adventure when he accidentally finds
a legendary hunk of plastic called the Piece of Resistance. Rebel
Lego-people bring Emmett into their movement, believing him to be the
prophesied Master Builder, who will use the Piece to defeat Lord
Business and save Legoland.
Given that all the characters and
backgrounds are made up of Legos, you might think this would be a
true stop-action animated film. Nope, this is another CGI-fest,
which freed the animators up to make “The Lego Movie” one long,
frenetic action sequence. Oh, every now and then they slow down for a
brief lesson about “believing in yourself,” but mostly everything
just MOVES, exhaustingly.
It isn't until the end, when Emmett
meets the Man Upstairs, that things get really meta and interesting.
At this point, all your assumptions about the story get turned on
their heads, and the movie becomes quite open to interpretation.
This segment explores the value of play and creativity versus
structure and control. It would be possible to find some commentary
here on regimented societies like China versus individualistic, more
chaotic societies like the U.S. Going deeper, one could view the
relationship between the Man Upstairs, his son, and the Lego world as
an allegory of Christian theology. Truth is, there's all kinds of
potential religious symbolism in this film. Emmett, himself, could
be viewed as a Christlike figure, a promised savior who turns out to
be different from what the people were expecting. The film also asks
whether prophesy is real or just made up to serve as a
self-fulfilling guide to future generations. Some might find the
movie to be Existentialist. I can't divine, though, whether the
filmmakers intended all this subtext or not, because they can't seem
to wait to get back to the mind-numbing action. That's the problem
with “The Lego Movie,” they don't slow down to offer any thought
or meaning until it's too late,your mind is already mush from all the
seizure-inducing kinetics.
When I first heard they were making a
Lego movie, I thought it was the dumbest idea ever. Then I started
hearing positive reviews and buzz, and my expectations rose to Pixar
levels. Now, having seen it, I feel pretty “meh” about it. The
ending does somewhat redeem the movie and provides some interesting
fuel for discussion. Truth be told, though, I was bored while
watching it, and for a movie like this, being boring is the one
unforgivable crime. Even worse than not following the instructions.
2.5 stars out of 5
No comments:
Post a Comment